Bản in của bài viết

The most effective way of protection from HIV/AIDS is to avoid infection with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Currently, the prevention of HIV infection is the most important tool to combat AIDS. One of the most common ways HIV transmission is via sexual intercourse. Therefore, reliable and accessible contraception is an important factor in preventing HIV/AIDS, which is a global issue that requires deep studying and analysis. The access to free condoms in public places causes much debate, since there are supporters and opponents of this method. This essay focuses on the issue of free condoms access in the public places and highlights its advantages and disadvantages how to write a philosophy paper

Despite the controversy of this issue, free access to condoms in public places has a significant impact on reducing the number of people infected with HIV, especially among the categories related to high-risk groups, such as drug addicts or prisoners. The proponents of this method claim that the access to condoms does not hurt pupils’ image of sexual life. Conversely, it will help to think about sexual life more consciously and carefully. Students do not always tend to buy condoms because of their price. Therefore, free access will reduce the risk of infection. Comprehensive sex education program including condom provision accepts the inevitability of adolescent sex and encourages students to make wise, safe decisions if they do have sex. It is government’s responsibility to provide high schools, prisons, and other communities with condoms. It is necessary to organize and conduct extensive information campaigns aimed at educating people about HIV spreading and prevention.

However, there can be negative aspects regarding the issue of free condoms access. Condom distribution in public places, especially in schools, can lead to distorted understanding of sexuality and sex. Young people may interpret it as a call to unrestricted sexual intercourses. Some students do not realize all responsibility of leading sex life. Therefore, condoms should not be in the free access. If students receive free condoms, they may seek to use them immediately without understanding all the consequences of their irresponsible actions. There is also an idea that such measures as free access to condoms in schools cannot be imposed. In addition, the distribution of condoms can be an incentive to start sex life before marriage, which opposes the principles of most religions.

The reasonable solution is to compromise. For example, the distribution of condoms in public places should be allowed only after raising efforts. Advocacy of this issue should be done only by qualified specialists. It can take the form of lectures and be supported by printed handout materials. In addition, it probably makes sense to give condoms for students after they have passed a specific test, which may include questions about proper sexual life, understanding of contraception, and characteristics of male and female anatomy. Besides, the free access to condoms in schools may be available only with parental consent.

In conclusion, the distribution of condoms in the public places is a controversial question, which requires deeper analysis. Undoubtedly, this method has advantages as it can prevent HIV/AIDS. On the other hand, the method has many opposing sides that state that the free access to condoms in public places, especially schools, will negatively influence pupils’ perception of sex. Therefore, the implementation of this method should be complemented by information campaign related to the topics of sexual life, ways of contraception, and methods of virus protection, especially from HIV/AIDS.